By David Icke
The David Icke Newsletter
TWO WRONGS MAKE A DOUBLE WRONG
Hello all …
Talk about deja vu. Was I watching protests in the Ukraine this week? Or Georgia? It certainly looked like it. But, no, it was Iran. I knew because the colour was different.
In Georgia in 2003 the colour was red, or ‘rose’, and in the Ukraine in 2004 it was orange. In Iran this week, it is green. Apart from that, the same modus operandi was playing out once again orchestrated by the usual suspects hiding in the shadows.
Most people see events in terms of polarities. It is either/or and black and white. For example, you are either for something or against it. Yet rarely is any situation so polarised, so clear-cut, and unless we look at the shades of grey we are never going to see what is truly going on.
To say the protests in Iran this week have been covertly manipulated by the United States, United Kingdom and Israel is not to say that I support the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or the ‘Supreme Leader’ dictatorship that really runs the country. Nor does it mean that I do not support the right of Iranian people to say what they feel about an election they believe to be rigged.
But there is another story to tell here that involves American, British and Israeli intelligence and the billionaire financier and Obama backer, George Soros. This intelligence trio and Soros have a common connecting force: the House of Rothschild.
Mossad operative, George Soros
The spider’s web that has been spun around the earth has its operational centre in Europe, in London, Rome, Paris, Berlin and Brussels. It is structured like a transnational corporation with the headquarters dictating ‘corporate’ policy to the ‘subsidiary companies’, the secret society networks in each country that answer to the ‘spider’. In turn, these national networks have their own subsidiaries in the cities, towns and communities.
In this way, the spider, which is very closely connected to the Rothschild dynasty, can influence all levels of society in any country and Iran is no different. It may not be as easy in Iran as it would be in Britain or America, but they can still do it and have done it many times.
In 1953, the Iranian Prime Minister Dr Mohammed Mossadegh was ousted in a CIA-planned coup called Operation Ajax and British and American manipulation replaced him with the vicious dictator, the Shah of Iran. This was agreed by US President Dwight D. Eisenhower and British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, and directed by the infamous US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and his brother, Allen Dulles, head of the CIA. Official documents have since confirmed this.
Mossadegh’s crime was to insist that the people of Iran enjoyed some benefits from Iranian oil. He nationalised the oil industry that had been controlled by the British government via the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, now British Petroleum, or BP. Mossadegh said in 1951:
‘Our long years of negotiations with foreign countries… have yielded no results this far. With the oil revenues we could meet our entire budget and combat poverty, disease, and backwardness among our people.
Another important consideration is that by the elimination of the power of the British company, we would also eliminate corruption and intrigue, by means of which the internal affairs of our country have been influenced. Once this tutelage has ceased, Iran will have achieved its economic and political independence.’
The British and American governments determined that it would not cease, however, and so enter Kermit Roosevelt, Jr., the grandson of President Theodore Roosevelt, and head of the CIA’s Near East and Africa division. He worked closely with another CIA agent called Donald Wilbur, as revealed in a CIA document entitled Clandestine Service History – Overthrow of Premier Mosaddeq of Iran – November 1952-August 1953.
Kermit Roosevelt, Jr.
The document details the way the coup against Mossadegh was engineered to bring the Shah to power and it puts new light on the ‘people’s revolutions’ in Georgia and the Ukraine and the protests in Iran this week. The CIA began a campaign of propaganda against Mossadegh within Iran and paid people to pose as Mossadegh supporters and threaten ‘savage punishment’ against anyone who opposed him, especially Muslims leaders.
This allowed the CIA to depict Mossadegh as a tyrannical dictator and the propaganda began to stir opposition protests from religious groups. There were eventually massive protests in the streets of Tehran organised by Roosevelt’s Operation Ajax. Roosevelt revealed in his 1979 book, Counter Coup: The Struggle for the Control of Iran, how he paid people to protest for and against Mossadegh to trigger violent clashes that led to widespread violence, looting and 300 dead. Outside of Tehran, tribesmen were paid to support a coup to replace Mossadegh with the Shah.
Roosevelt secured control of the Iranian military with help from Norman
Schwarzkopf Sr., the father of ‘Stormin’ Norman’, who commanded the US military and their allies in the Gulf War of 1991. Father Schwarzkopf trained and organised security forces in support of the Shah which later became the horrific secret police known as the SAVAK.
The Iranian military intervened to remove Mossadegh who was jailed and then lived out his life under house arrest. The Shah was placed into ‘power’ as a puppet of Britain and America and , surprise, surprise, he reached agreement with the oil companies to give them the vast majority of Iranian oil revenues. The same combination removed the Shah for Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979.
They want to give the impression of spontaneous ‘peoples revolutions’ because it hides the covert manipulation of events and the involvement of the Rothschild ‘axis-of-evil’ – British, American and Israeli intelligence.
This is what happened in Georgia in 2003 when Mikhail Saakashvili was brought to power by a CIA/Soros-engineered ‘people’s revolution’, or the ‘Revolution of Roses’, which removed President Eduard Shevardnadze.
In Georgia, the colour was red
Saakashvili is a graduate of George Washington University in Washington DC and Columbia University Law School in New York. He is one of many American-trained agents controlled by the network of financier George Soros and his associate, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former National Security Advisor to Jimmy Carter and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission. Both are mentors to President Obama.
Soros manipulates events through a complex network of foundations and organisations operating across the world in league with elite groups and agencies in the United States and Israel, including the CIA and Mossad. It was this Soros network, especially his Open Society Institute, which trained and funded Georgian students in the art of mass protest and funded the opposition TV station that mobilised the demonstrations.
Zaza Gachechiladze, editor-in-chief of The Georgian Messenger, said: ‘It’s generally accepted public opinion here that Mr. Soros is the person who planned Shevardnadze’s overthrow.’ As Manly P. Hall, the 33rd Degree Freemason and ‘Masonry’s greatest philosopher’, said:
‘… it is so difficult to determine the position of the ancient initiates … They are the invisible powers behind the thrones of earth, and men are but marionettes, dancing while the invisible ones pull the strings. We see the dancer, but the master mind that does the work remains concealed by the cloak of silence.’
These ‘people’s revolutions’ are really coups in disguise and they take the same pattern of election victories claimed to be fraudulent followed by public demonstrations. Invariably, they are symbolised by a colour worn by the demonstrators. It is classic, therefore, to see the colour green at the centre of protests in Iran.
The ‘hero’ in the latest colour-coded drama is Mir-Hossein Mousavi, the prime minister from 1981 to 1989, who claims that Ahmadinejad’s election victory, officially by a landslide, was fixed. Mousavi claimed victory and urged his supporters to protest.
Mir-Hossein Mousavi: Mr. Green.
Now it may or may not have been fixed, though no evidence has yet been produced, but events have followed a very familiar pattern. President Saakashvili claimed he had won an election in Georgia, but had been denied by vote-rigging. Protests followed that put him in power. President Viktor Yushchenko claimed he had won an election in the Ukraine, but had been denied by vote-rigging. Protests followed that over-turned the result and led to a new election that put him in power.
In the Ukraine, the colour was orange.
Researcher Paul Craig Roberts put it very well in a CounterPunch article this week:
‘The claim is made that Ahmadinejad stole the election, because the outcome was declared too soon after the polls closed for all the votes to have been counted. However, Mousavi declared his victory several hours before the polls closed. This is classic CIA destabilization designed to discredit a contrary outcome. It forces an early declaration of the vote.
The longer the time interval between the pre-emptive declaration of victory and the release of the vote tally, the longer Mousavi has to create the impression that the authorities are using the time to fix the vote. It is amazing that people don’t see through this trick.’
As Roberts points out, the evidence for CIA involvement in this week’s events is overwhelming. Their fingerprints are everywhere. Two years ago, ABC News reported that the Bush administration had given secret approval for the CIA to launch a covert operation to destabilise the Iranian government. Pity old Kermit’s not still around, he had the blueprint. The London Daily Telegraph reported in 2007:
‘Mr. Bush has signed an official document endorsing CIA plans for a propaganda and disinformation campaign intended to destabilise, and eventually topple, the theocratic rule of the mullahs.’
You might also recall the story in 2008 that received quite wide publicity when investigative journalist Seymour Hersh wrote this in the New Yorker:
‘Late last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources. These operations, for which the President sought up to four hundred million dollars, were described in a Presidential Finding signed by Bush, and are designed to destabilize the country’s religious leadership.’
The day before the Iranian election, the neoconservative extremist, Kenneth Timmerman (Rothschild Zionist), said there was ‘talk of a ‘green revolution in Tehran’. What is he, a bloody psychic? Well, no, he doesn’t have to be. Timmerman co-founded the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (FDI) in 1995 along with Joshua Muravchik (Rothschild Zionist) and the late Peter W. Rodham (Rothschild Zionist).
The FDI is an extremely well-funded operation to create unrest in Iran and one its founders, Joshua Muravchik, wrote an article in the Los Angeles Times calling for Iran to be bombed. Timmerman was among the major propaganda architects of the Iraq invasion and one of his articles carried this confident headline six months before the troops went in:
‘How Saddam Got Weapons of Mass Destruction: Saddam Hussein’s War Machine Is Being Built Systematically to Strike At the United States With New Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons Designed to Kill Millions.’
Timmerman predicted the ‘green revolution’ the day before the Iranian election because he knew what was planned and his own organisation would have been seriously involved. Timmerman also wrote:
‘The National Endowment for Democracy has spent millions of dollars during the past decade promoting ‘color’ revolutions in places such as Ukraine and Serbia, training political workers in modern communications and organizational techniques.
Some of that money appears to have made it into the hands of pro-Mousavi groups, who have ties to non-governmental organizations outside Iran that the National Endowment for Democracy funds.’
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was established in 1983 by an act of Congress and plays a major role in destabilising target countries. Bill Berkowitz ofWorking for Change says:
‘The NED functions as a full-service infrastructure building clearinghouse. It provides money, technical support, supplies, training programs, media know-how, public relations assistance and state-of-the-art equipment to select political groups, civic organizations, labor unions, dissident movements, student groups, book publishers, newspapers, and other media. Its aim is to destabilize progressive movements, particularly those with a socialist or democratic socialist bent.’
More accurately, I would say, it attacks any regime that is potentially in the way of the Rothschild agenda. Barack Obama has said America won’t meddle in the internal affairs of Iran when this is precisely what is happening. He plans to fund Iranian dissident groups with $20 million in USAID grants, but that is a fraction of the money being spent in secret. The man is such a fraud.
The Israeli Mossad is also deeply involved in covert operations inside Iran. Meir Dagan, a former commando and retired general, took over Mossad in 2002 and, according to ‘security sources’ quoted in the media, his brief was to monitor and sabotage the Iranian nuclear program ahead of any decision by Israel to use air strikes. Dagan was reappointed this week until 2010. Western media reports have claimed Mossad involvement in sabotage at Iranian nuclear facilities and attacks on Iranian scientists and military personnel.
In Iran, the colour is green.
Sitting in the middle, like a violin waiting to be played, are the people of these target countries who have genuine grievances against the incumbent regime. This dissatisfaction with the status quo is exploited by the agent provocateurs and propaganda that generates the mass protests to bring about the goal of the manipulation – ‘regime change’.
But while the names and faces may change, those in the shadows simply increase the power and influence they have over the country by having their puppets in political office. President Saakashvili in Georgia would hardly blow his nose without asking the United States for permission. Some ‘people’s revolution’, eh?
It’s simple. Instead of invading a country to install the leaders you want, get the population to do it for you while thinking they are a symbol of ‘people power’. John Bolton, the neoconservative crazy in the Bush administration, said a US military attack on Iran would only happen if economic sanctions and attempts to foment a ‘popular revolution’ failed.
This focus on Iran is once again connected to the domination of the gathering global battleground that Brzezinski calls ‘Eurasia’. Have a look at this map of Eurasia and see how many countries are subject to unrest, conflict and invasion in the region surrounding Iran.
This is the whole of Eurasia and below is the area that is being especially targeted …
The military and covert operations orchestrated by Britain, America and Israel, all controlled by the House of Rothschild, have invaded and destabilised Iraq and Afghanistan and are now moving in on Pakistan with their mounting campaign of bombing. The engineered terrorist attacks in Mumbai, a speciality of Mossad, are part of the destabilisation of India.
Two Taliban militant leaders, who defected from the notorious Taliban chief in Pakistan, Baitullah Mehsud, the mass killer of civilians and military personnel, said he was an ‘American agent’ pursuing a US-Israeli agenda in Pakistan. One of them, Turkistan Bittani, said that Mehsud was being funded by US and Israeli intelligence services for brainwashing innocent youths.
Bittani pointed out that the al-Qaeda and Taliban leadership had never been targeted by the dozens of US drone strikes in Pakistan’s north-west region. The other defector, Qari Zainuddin, said that Mehsud had established strong links with Israeli intelligence services which were destabilising the country. ‘These people [Mehsud and his associates] are working against Islam’, he said. They are working for the Rothschild Zionists and the Illuminati.
The big prize in this area is Iran, which would connect Iraq with Afghanistan and Pakistan and give them control of a vast region from Israel to the border with China. Iran would also give the British-American-Israeli cabal greater access to the Caspian Sea with its massive oil and gas reserves.
The plan is to control as many countries as possible that border Russia and that is the reason for the ‘people’s revolutions’ in Georgia and Ukraine and their desire to join NATO. The Rothschild cabal wants to trigger a war involving Russia and China that will bring about the planned world government and world army. Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard:
‘Potentially, the most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an “anti-hegemonic” coalition united not by ideology but by complementary grievances. It would be reminiscent in scale and scope of the challenge posed by the Sino-Soviet bloc, though this time China would likely be the leader and Russia the follower. Averting this contingency, however remote it may be, will require a display of U.S. geostrategic skill on the western, eastern, and southern perimeters of Eurasia simultaneously.’
Brzezinski, Soros and the Rothschild Zionist network control Barack Obama and he does whatever they say. His first act in office was to agree bombing raids on Pakistan and he has backed off from threatening Iran with a military attack while covert operations worked to oust the Iranian regime another way. If that doesn’t work, you will see the atmosphere change because they want Iran and they will not stop until they get it.
Netanyahu: If it doesn’t work the boys are going in …
Standing in the wings, fingers on buttons, are the Israeli trio of shoot-to-kill maniacs, Prime Minister Netanyahu, Foreign Minister Lieberman and Defence Minister Barak, the guy in charge of operations when the Palestinians were slaughtered in Gaza. They can’t wait to scream ‘chocks away’ and bomb targets in Iran and if the ‘green revolution’ goes nowhere the calls for military attacks will be wound up again.
The mainstream media has reported events in Tehran this week with their usual bias and ignorance, but, as always, the truth is very different.